By: Rev. Pamela Dolan
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
April 2, 2010
Lord Jesus Christ, you stretched out your arms of love on the hard wood of the Cross that everyone might come within the reach of your saving embrace: So clothe us in your Spirit that we, reaching forth our hands in love, may bring those who do not know you to the knowledge and love of you; for the honor of your Name. Amen. (Book of Common Prayer)
On Good Friday Christians all over the world spend a lot of time contemplating the Cross. What does it mean that Jesus died on a cross? Why did he do it? What did it accomplish? How does it matter in our lives today that it happened?
Anglicans are known for being incarnational, which means they often focus more on the beginning of Jesus’ life (how wonderful it is that God became flesh and dwelt among us) or on his ministry and the ways we can continue to seek and serve Christ in the people around us, than we do on his Passion. I have heard people say, “Anglicans are an Easter people, not a Good Friday people.” Anglican churches are more likely to have simple crosses than crucifixes.
Having such a variety of theologies included in, and therefore in some sense authorized by, the Book of Common Prayer tells us much about the Anglican ethos of striving for unity within diversity. Such an acceptance and even celebration of theological diversity is really the key to the Anglican heritage. There is something both profound and humble inherent in the tradition. At least since the time of Elizabeth I, Anglicans have sought ways to navigate between exclusive, either-or modes of thinking by embracing not a wishy-washy middle ground but an inclusive vision in which what unites Anglicans is more valued than what separates them. As that is true in large categories, like seeing the church as both Catholic and Reformed, so it is true in more specific theological controversies, like the nature of atonement. One does not have to choose the one, official “Anglican theology of atonement” in order to be an Episcopalian. More than that, the church as such does not have to choose one narrow theology of atonement around which to define itself as a church.
At one point in our lives, for example, we might find the inspiration we need to look more closely at the life of Christ and to consider how we are being called to lives of discipleship and service for the life of the world. At another time, stumbling across the Rite I Eucharist Prayer and the phrase “by his one oblation of himself once offered, a full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation, and satisfaction, for the sins of the whole world,” we might find ourselves able to rest in the assurance that our sins have been forgiven and to find comfort in the idea that the sacrifice of Christ was complete and sufficient and needs no further work or effort on our part. In the collect for Palm Sunday (which focuses on “the example of his great humility” and asks that “we may walk in the way of his suffering, and also share in his resurrection”), we might find ourselves rejoicing in the glory of the Incarnation, and humbly seeking to follow Christ’s example more closely. It might even help us in times of suffering to hold fast to the hope of the resurrection, and to give thanks for the companionship that Christ offers.
